Answers to Questions - Creation vs. Evolution

Don’t like body parts show common ancestry - or Evolution?

NO. Do wheels on cars mean their reproductive "ancestors" were chariots. Doesn’t it make sense, that one designer with an entire plan necessitating a broad variety of species, might use similar good design on different species? Think about it for a minute. There are many, many species that we might regard as nonessential. (And probably at different stages in earth development some become nonessential and become extinct). But there are many "pests" we sometimes don’t realize are essential. Bees pollinate plants. Worms help prepare soil for growth. Insects provide food for birds that humans eat. The list is extensive. If you consider that you may need several types of birds (quail - good food, and vultures - to clean up dead things) you might apply a good wing design to both. Man, earthworms and other creatures all have counterparts with similar parts, but there is absolutely NO reason to think they evolved from common ancestors. Darwin EXPECTED fossil finds to PROVE transitional species (there were few fossils in Darwin’s day). Guess what? Millions upon millions of fossils later, we still haven’t found ONE transitional fossil.

Return to Questions

 

 

Copyright 2004 Evidence of God Ministries, Ralph Muncaster
All Rights Reserved. Created by
Exodus Design Studios